almalinux

In the wake of CentOS’s shift from a stable server edition to a rolling release model, many businesses involved in enterprise computing have been on the lookout for viable, long-term alternatives to fill that void. Two promising contenders that have emerged are AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux. Both operating systems are gaining traction as replacements for CentOS and bringing new choices to the table alongside established players like Ubuntu. Here, we'll delve into a comparison of AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux with Ubuntu, focusing on their suitability for enterprise environments. AlmaLinux: Developed by the team at CloudLinux, AlmaLinux serves as a 1:1 binary compatible fork of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL).

In the ever-evolving landscape of enterprise IT, Linux-based operating systems remain pivotal, thanks largely to their stability, security, and open-source nature. Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) has been a top contender in this space, renowned for its robust performance and extensive support. However, the shift in Red Hat’s strategy towards CentOS—a free derivative of RHEL commonly used in the enterprise—led to the rise of two significant alternatives: Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux. For organizations relying heavily on Linux systems, understanding the compatibility of these new entrants with Red Hat systems is crucial. Here, we delve into how Rocky Linux and AlmaLinux stack up against RHEL.

As the world of Linux continues to expand and evolve, the tools that users utilize to manage and monitor their systems are equally advancing. Among the myriad of Linux distributions available today, AlmaLinux and Ubuntu stand out for their stability, robust support, and rich set of features. While both distributions provide powerful platforms for deploying server and desktop environments, they bring different philosophies and tools to network management. In this blog, we dive deep into the AlmaLinux’s Cockpit and Ubuntu’s GUI network tools, to help you understand their functionalities, ease of use, and how they stack up against each other.

Understanding file permission defaults is crucial for system security and functionality, particularly when you're running a Linux distribution. Today, we will dive into the nuanced world of file permissions in two popular distributions: Debian and AlmaLinux. These two embody different aspects of the Linux ecosystem, with Debian being one of the oldest and most influential distributions, while AlmaLinux stands as a newer, community-driven fork of CentOS. Let's explore how these systems handle file permissions by default and what that means for users and administrators. Before comparing Debian and AlmaLinux, it's important to understand the basics of Linux file permissions.

When managing security on Linux servers, understanding the intricacies of Security-Enhanced Linux (SELinux) across different distributions is crucial. In today’s spotlight, we delve deep into how SELinux is implemented and managed in three popular Linux distributions: AlmaLinux, Rocky Linux, and Ubuntu. What is SELinux? Before we dive into the differences, let’s quickly recap what SELinux is. SELinux is a security architecture integrated into the Linux kernel using the Linux Security Modules (LSM) framework. Initially developed by the United States National Security Agency (NSA), SELinux adds mandatory access control (MAC) to further bolster the system's defense against unauthorized access.

In the realm of enterprise computing, having access to a wide range of tested and reliable software packages is crucial. This is where EPEL (Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux) comes into play, especially for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) clones like AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux. In this blog post, we'll delve into what the EPEL repository is, why it’s essential, and how you can seamlessly integrate it into AlmaLinux and Rocky Linux to enhance your system's capabilities. EPEL stands for Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux.

In the contemporary digital age, the security and confidentiality of data have become paramount. As threats evolve, so too must our defenses. One robust method of protecting data is through disk encryption, which ensures that data on a drive is unreadable without the appropriate key or password. This article will delve into disk encryption techniques for two popular Linux distributions: Ubuntu (based on Debian) and AlmaLinux (a fork of CentOS, derived from Red Hat Enterprise Linux). Ubuntu, one of the most popular Linux distributions, uses LUKS (Linux Unified Key Setup) for disk encryption. LUKS is a standard for Linux hard disk encryption that provides a uniform method of managing encrypted disks.

Linux, the powerhouse behind countless servers and desktops worldwide, continues to be a beacon of innovation and flexibility in the software world. Diverse distributions offer specialized tools, environments, and philosophies catering to different audiences from beginners to advanced users, and to various usages from personal desktops to enterprise servers. Today, let’s dive into an overview of some of the most popular and influential Linux distributions: Ubuntu, CloudLinux, AlmaLinux, Rocky Linux, Debian, and OpenSUSE. Ubuntu is perhaps the most well-known Linux distribution, especially among newcomers. Developed by Canonical Ltd., Ubuntu is based on Debian and is designed to be user-friendly and functional out-of-the-box.